What is a potential mitigation for denial of service attacks in AI?

Prepare for the ISACA Advanced in AI Security Management (AAISM) Test. Study with in-depth multiple choice questions, each offering insightful hints and detailed explanations. Equip yourself with expert knowledge and get exam-ready!

Multiple Choice

What is a potential mitigation for denial of service attacks in AI?

Explanation:
Denial of service attacks aim to make an AI service unavailable by overwhelming its resources. The best mitigation combines preventing overload with spotting abnormal traffic. Rate limiting places a cap on how many requests a client or user can send in a given time, which protects the system from sudden bursts and helps maintain availability for legitimate users. Pairing that with anomaly detection gives visibility into unusual or bot-like traffic patterns, allowing automated responses such as throttling, challenging, or blocking suspicious activity before it overwhelms the system. This approach directly tackles both the volume of incoming requests and the nature of the traffic, keeping AI services operational under stress. The other options don’t address availability: increasing data leakage controls focuses on confidentiality, reducing system monitoring reduces detection and response capability, and limiting access only during peak times unnecessarily hinders legitimate users and doesn’t reduce the attack impact.

Denial of service attacks aim to make an AI service unavailable by overwhelming its resources. The best mitigation combines preventing overload with spotting abnormal traffic. Rate limiting places a cap on how many requests a client or user can send in a given time, which protects the system from sudden bursts and helps maintain availability for legitimate users. Pairing that with anomaly detection gives visibility into unusual or bot-like traffic patterns, allowing automated responses such as throttling, challenging, or blocking suspicious activity before it overwhelms the system. This approach directly tackles both the volume of incoming requests and the nature of the traffic, keeping AI services operational under stress. The other options don’t address availability: increasing data leakage controls focuses on confidentiality, reducing system monitoring reduces detection and response capability, and limiting access only during peak times unnecessarily hinders legitimate users and doesn’t reduce the attack impact.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy